chukk
Global Moderator
Im Back
Posts: 99
|
Post by chukk on Oct 3, 2012 12:26:54 GMT -5
|
|
[Anthony]
Incredibly Average
[M0n:1000]
Likely going to be a lurker
Posts: 56
|
Post by [Anthony] on Oct 3, 2012 13:29:25 GMT -5
Oh, goodness. I'm sorry. That's incredibly insensitive. :/
|
|
chukk
Global Moderator
Im Back
Posts: 99
|
Post by chukk on Oct 3, 2012 13:40:57 GMT -5
Not to mention it made front page headlining news in today's paper, that I just found out about and went and bought
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 0:02:30 GMT -5
Well, this doesn't make the situation any easier, but it doesn't change it either. It is what it is and I'm sorry.
|
|
|
Post by lbthrizzy on Oct 4, 2012 2:41:42 GMT -5
Damn. My condolences.
|
|
chukk
Global Moderator
Im Back
Posts: 99
|
Post by chukk on Oct 4, 2012 9:29:42 GMT -5
What erks me the most is, she died July 4th, if they were gonna make a big stink about it in the media why start now, and going public with an inquest, why is it ok for an inquest to open to the public to people who don't know me, my family, my kids, or the situation, how do they expect 6 random people who come from no medical, or scientific background to be able to make a decision like this. Also, it states that the coroner/judge can choose to use the jury's decision or choose not to use it so then what's the point of the inquest?
|
|